Statement on Port One Logistics Park Expansion Proposal

Suffolk County Council, acting in its role as Highway Authority, has issued a holding objection to the proposed expansion of Port One Logistics Park in Great Blakenham.

This means the application cannot currently be supported due to significant concerns that must be addressed by the developer before it can progress. These include shortcomings in the Transport Assessment, insufficient evidence on traffic impact and highway safety, and a lack of robust proposals to support sustainable travel such as walking, cycling and public transport.

Of particular importance are the potential impacts on local roads, the routing of HGV traffic, and the need to ensure safe and suitable access for all users. This includes residents of Great Blakenham, Claydon and neighbouring communities. The County Council has also been clear that stronger commitments are required to improve active travel links, public rights of way and employee travel planning.

I welcome the fact that these issues have been clearly identified and formally raised. However, this now presents a clear test for the Green Party administration at Mid Suffolk District Council. If they are to live up to their green credentials, they must ensure that any future version of this proposal genuinely prioritises sustainable transport, significantly reduces HGV impacts, and properly addresses the loss of wildlife and habitats associated with development on this scale. That means securing meaningful, deliverable improvements for walking, cycling and public transport, alongside robust biodiversity protection and enhancement — not just well-intentioned statements.

Any development of this scale must demonstrate that its impacts can be properly mitigated and that it delivers real benefits, not just for business, but for local communities and the wider transport network.

I will continue to follow this application closely and will keep residents informed as further information is submitted and the proposal develops.

Read the letter outlining the holding objection in full here.